Download Lectures on Biostatistics (1971).
Corrected and searchable version of Google books edition

Download review of Lectures on Biostatistics (THES, 1973).

Latest Tweets

The British Medical Journal ran an article on “doctor bloggers” last week.

BMJ header

Photo ©Mark Thomas

The BMJ put the article behind a paywall, but you can download a reprint here.

Oops, no you can’t. The BMJ have dictated that their piece on bloggers should not be available to bloggers. If you want a copy, email me. The question of availability is more interesting than the article itself anyway. It is by a journalist, Rebecca Coombes. Contrary to what you might think from reading it, I have never met her. She asked for opinions by email, so I spent a while writing something out, which she cut and pasted into an article (and I spent another hour with their photographer, Mark Thomas, who took a lot of pictures). But I can’t use either the article or the photos freely. I don’t even get paid. The commercial journals, as always, do pretty well out of exploiting academics.

The picture at the top should have been Ben Goldacre, whose badscience.net is now number two in the world. That picture prompted the child of a friend to ask if I was doing an impression of a velocirapter, I guess that is one better that gimpyblog’s perception of me as being a dead ringer for some computer game thug.

So here is another one (possibly no less scary).

Photo ©Mark Thomas

By way of compensation, here is a picture of Goldacre.


Science writer award 2005

Goldacre said

“. . . blogs are popular because they are more honest than other media. It is hard to get away with misrepresenting stuff when the original source is but a click away.  I see it as a way of making conversation public. What is good about it is you get unmediated expertise.”

“In the press it’s hard to know what is true. But with blogs people can link directly to the original source: this never happens in a newspaper.”

DC said

“I think they [blogs] have really had some success in spreading public understanding of science and even in influencing public affairs (firstly with the merger [of Imperial and UCL] and more recently with withdrawal of NHS funding for homoeopathy).  My own research is on the stochastic properties of single ion channels.  I love it, but it is specialist and of zero interest to the public. So it’s fun to talk about things that do interest the public. It’s also fun to be able to influence politicians and vice chancellors, though that is rather harder.”

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

7 Responses to Bloggers

  • jdc325 says:

    “I think they [blogs] have really had some success in spreading public understanding of science”

    I can vouch for that. If it wasn’t for sites like this and Bad Science I’d (still) be in the dark. I even found Holford plausible.

  • coracle says:

    And on my blog profile, I pretend to be a computer game thug.

    Interesting piece, I’ve been reading Dr Crippen for a little while. Haven’t really followed Dr Rant though.

  • jamesdoeser says:

    surely this reflects very poorly on the state of the world in two ways:
    1st, that there are some readers of the BMJ who HAVEN’T heard of the mighty DC and badscience
    2nd, that this youngster didn’t instantly think of Roald Dahl’s BFG when she saw the first pic. http://www.bbc.co.uk/manchester/content/image_galleries/cosgrove_hall_30_years_gallery.shtml?5

  • Hmm this is getting out of hand. But if I have to choose an image, I go for jamesdoesser’s Big Friendly Giant, every time.

    Much more of this and I’ll begin to feel like some of his Bad Archeology.

  • Mojo says:

    “That picture prompted the child of a friend to ask if I was doing an impression of a velocirapter…”

    There’s a definite glint in the eye there, as you spot something on-screen, and the fingers are evidently poised to type.


  • Dr Aust says:

    I like the image of DC aiming shafts of illumination at the Endarkment via the keyboard.

    BTW, as tuners-in to his occasional radio performances will know, DC is actually mild-mannered and dryly humorous, so razor-toothed velociraptors or kung-fu game superheros are a bit of a stretch. He is also known in scientific circles for always being willing to make time to explain things, no matter how dim the question. I remember him once spending at least an hour explaining some very mundane aspect of least-squares curve-fittting to me back when I was a snot-nosed PhD student in a nearby Dept – I had previously unsuccessfully asked the real statisticians the same question, and after some head-scratching they referred me to DC. He didn’t know me from Adam, and I was very obviously a junior twit, but he still made the time.

  • ulber says:

    Oops, you can! (download the article, that is…)

    Click to access bmj2007.pdf

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.